+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Anti-Virus question

  1. #11
    Secretaznman's Avatar Duck
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Olympia
    Age
    24
    Posts
    472
    Duck Bills
    775

    Default

    Its a trap

  2. #12
    Owosso's Avatar Digital Somalian
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Marysville, WA
    Age
    19
    Posts
    1,845
    Duck Bills
    945

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Secretaznman View Post
    Its a trap
    I wouldn't be surprised. Those types of pictures usually are.

    Also, female plumber's crack is disgusting. If you edited out a better picture (it says your post was edited), one with 100% more nudity, I'd be disappointed. Unless, of course, it was male nudity, in which case I'm glad you edited it out (especially if it involved ACiD - we've seen enough of his shenanigans here).

  3. #13
    Rad Lionheart ©'s Avatar Duck
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Deroche B.C. Canada
    Age
    22
    Posts
    1,863
    Duck Bills
    640

    Default

    Bit Defender (for simplicity) or Kaspersky (for better control over the application) as they're pretty much the top 2 rated antivirus softwares for windows right now.
    Also, Kaspersky scans applications and sub/child data before execution, which can lock up applications. Though if you trust it, you can add it to the "trusted applications" list, which always works great.
    Symantec has gone downhill after 2003. They lag far behind on updates, dont fix their application much when exploits are found, etc.
    Radical African Feline Cardiovascular Organ.

  4. #14
    Irish's Avatar Grand Ass
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Age
    30
    Posts
    172
    Duck Bills
    545

    Default

    is BD really rated high lately? I hasn't been in the past, and that bothers me.

    edit: oh, regarding Kaspersky and its methods: If you want security that works and has hit the absolute highest ratings for damn near every test that security reviewers can throw around, then you put up with an app that is "stern".

    Id prefer to have my av catch things and bother me to set trusted apps, then to have holes and let all traffic through regardless.

  5. #15
    Owosso's Avatar Digital Somalian
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Marysville, WA
    Age
    19
    Posts
    1,845
    Duck Bills
    945

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irish View Post
    is BD really rated high lately? I hasn't been in the past, and that bothers me.

    edit: oh, regarding Kaspersky and its methods: If you want security that works and has hit the absolute highest ratings for damn near every test that security reviewers can throw around, then you put up with an app that is "stern".

    Id prefer to have my av catch things and bother me to set trusted apps, then to have holes and let all traffic through regardless.
    In general, I'd share your stance. But I'm not opening .rar files named "virus_extract_now," and I don't go to questionable sites. The questionable sites I DO visit are kept in check by assorted firefox addons and common sense with my clicking finger.
    So when the anti-virus program is doing me more harm than it is good, I don't really care. Which is why I'm using Microsoft Security Essentials right now. And I probably don't even need that.
    BUT, for the average user who's prone to viruses and the like, or just someone who doesn't mind things like Windows' UAC (clicking ALLOW every time holy shit whyyyyy), Kaspersky is great.

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts